RESUMEN
Background: People with HIV (PWH) have a higher risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is highly effective in preventing severe COVID-19, although medical mistrust may contribute to vaccine hesitancy among PWH. Method(s): PWH from 8 sites in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) completed the clinical assessment of patient-reported outcomes including a vaccine hesitancy instrument as part of routine care from 2/21-4/22. Participants were defined as vaccine hesitant if they had not yet received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and would probably or definitely not receive it. We assessed factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy using logistic regression, and adjusted for demographics, unsuppressed viral load >200 copies/mL, calendar month and time on ART. Result(s): Overall, 3,278 PWH with a median age of 55 responded;19% were female sex at birth;93% were virally suppressed. At the time of survey, 27% reported they had not received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, of whom 27% (n=242;7% overall) reported vaccine hesitancy. Of these 242, 82% expressed concerns about vaccine efficacy;86% about side effects;38% reported distrust of healthcare, 53% reported concerns about vaccine contents (i.e. trackers, live virus);and 24% did not perceive risk from COVID-19. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy included female sex (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 2.0;95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.5-2.8;Table), Black vs. White race (AOR 1.8;95% CI: 1.3-2.5), age< 30 years (AOR 2.8;95% CI: 1.5-5.2), South/Midwest vs. Northeast region (AOR 1.7;95% CI: 1.2-2.4), years on ART (0.8;0.7-0.9) and unsuppressed viral load (AOR 2.2;95% CI: 1.4-3.5). Hesitancy decreased over time (AOR 0.9 per month;95% CI: 0.8-0.9). Vaccine side effects were the primary concern for women;vaccine contents for Black PWH and those who were unsuppressed;and lack of perceived COVID-19 risk for youth. Conclusion(s): Vaccine hesitancy was reported by approximately 7% of a U.S. multi-site cohort of PWH, and it was more prevalent among Black PWH, women, youth, those with unsuppressed viral loads, and residents of the South/ Midwest. The association between virologic non-suppression and vaccine hesitancy highlights the intertwined challenge of medical mistrust for both HIV and COVID-19. Although vaccine hesitancy decreased over time, renewed efforts will be needed to address concerns of PWH about the COVID-19 vaccine, given the ongoing need for revaccination with the evolution of the pandemic.
RESUMEN
Background: Disruptions in clinical services during the COVID-19 pandemic could compromise past progress towards meeting U.S. Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) goals. We examined changes in the proportion with virologic suppression (VS) before and since the onset of COVID-19 in a multi-site U.S. cohort of people with HIV (PWH) using an interrupted time series design. Method(s): We assessed VS (< 200 copies/mL) trajectories 1/1/2018-1/1/2022, comparing trends before and after March 21, 2020 at 8 HIV clinics within the U.S. Center for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS'). Hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression and interrupted time series analyses examined changes in the trend (i.e., slope) of VS over time, and maximum likelihood estimation was used to account for missing VS data among those lost to follow-up (LTFU) post-COVID-19. Analyses were adjusted for demographics, site, CDC transmission group, CD4 nadir, VS, time on ART. Result(s): Data from 17,999 participants were included, providing a total of 120,918 VS assessments. Median age was 53 (interquartile range 42-61);19% were female sex at birth;the mean time on ART was 9.5 years;18% were unsuppressed at any point;17.7% were LTFU. Among the overall population, prior gains in VS slowed during COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.93 per quarter-year;95% CI: 0.88-0.98;p=0.004;Figure). Greater impacts occurred among women (AOR 0.90;95% CI 0.81-0.99;p=0.05), persons with a history of injection drug use (PWID) (AOR 0.77 95% CI: 0.66-0.90;p=0.001), and Black PWH (AOR 0.90;95% CI: 0.84-0.96;p=0.001) in whom prior positive VS trends plateaued or began to reverse (Figure). VS remained lower among those with unstable housing (AOR 0.44;95% CI: 0.40-0.50;p< 0.001) but stayed unchanged from the pre-pandemic period. Conclusion(s): Previous gains in VS slowed during the COVID-19 pandemic among PWH in a multi-site network of U.S. HIV clinics. Known disparities in VS according to housing status remain unchanged, but VS disparities worsened for PWH who were women, PWID, or Black. Changes in VS trends could be related to socioeconomic impacts of the pandemic, insurance lapses, reduction of in-person clinic services, fear of coming to clinics, or other factors. Renewed investment in HIV public health and clinical services will be vital to achieve the U.S. EHE goals following COVID-19, with additional targeted interventions to support key populations with persistent or worsening disparities needed.
RESUMEN
Background: After COVID-19 shelter-in-place (SIP) orders on 3/16/2020, viral suppression (VS) rates initially decreased within a safety-net HIV clinic in San Francisco, with greater decreases among homeless people living with HIV (PLWH). We sought to understand if (1) proactive outreach to provide social services, (2) scaling up of in-person visits for most patients and drop-in visits at the clinic, and (3) expansion of housing programs could reverse this decline. Methods: We assessed VS 24 months before and 13 months after SIP using mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score methods, followed by interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to examine changes in the rate of viral suppression per month. Loss to follow-up was assessed via active clinic outreach and tracing using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: The cohort contained 1816 patients with a median age of 51;12% female, 14% unstably housed, and 15% with CD4+-cell counts <200 cells/mm3. The adjusted odds of VS increased 1.34-fold following the intervention (95% CI: 1.21-1.46), with similar results using inverse probability weighting (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.31;95% CI: 1.17-1.46). Results from the ITS analysis show that the odds of VS continuously increased by 1.05-fold per month over the post-intervention period (95% CI: 1.01-1.08, Figure). Proactive phone outreach successfully reached 90.0% of the clinic to offer services. The one-year cumulative loss to follow-up rate was 3.2% (95% CI: 2.5-3.9%). The proportion of total attended visits that were telephone visits decreased from a maximum of 64.9% to a minimum of 10.1% at the end of the analysis period. The rate of viral load monitoring decreased by 15% after the institution of SIP (95% CI: 0.83-0.88). Among homeless PLWH, the AOR for VS was 1.70 (95% CI: 1.24-2.34) and there was a 5.9% increase in VS per month using ITS methods (95% CI: 1.0-12.3%). Conclusion: After an initial destabilization in VS in a large safety-net clinic following SIP orders, the VS rate increased following scale-up of in-person visits, clinic outreach to patients, intensification of social services during this time, and access to COVID-related housing programs. The loss to follow-up rate was similar or lower compared to prior years. Maintaining in-person care for underserved patients, with flexible telemedicine options, along with provision of social services and permanent expansion of housing assistance programs, will be needed to support VS among underserved populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.